Review Home Page

Submission Introduction

DVA Request For submissions

VEA s 4A

Non Publication Computer Code

Non Application High Court Precedents

Writeway Reports ultra vires

Minister Has Authority to Make Decisions

Claims Redetermined After Ultra Vires

Referral Diagnosis Precedent to High Court

Consent Declaration

Researcher Instructions

Non publication of computer Code

VEA sec 24, for one, is incorrectly treated.

Large numbers of decisions should be “ultra vires”.

The method of comparing the law (legislation and court precedents) with an individual veteran's claims is by use of computer programs. The accuracy of these programs has not been subjected to genuinely independent scrutiny. To my knowledge the computer code is not publicly available.

I've researched about 20 cases for my advocates which gives me access to copies of relevant correspondence. The formal decisions and associated material enable me to make some preliminary observations. The material on this page deals with aspects of one matter - determining "special rate".

Worksheets show the "Banovich" precedent is not applied. - See Correct Interpretation of Remunerative Work.doc below.

They also show that VEA Section 28 is not considered.

The following information is provided in support of this item.